


When a couple separates, it does not necessarily mean Court proceedings will need to be issued. In relation to married couples, the parties could arrange for Voluntary Disclosure to take place. This is where the parties usually exchange a document called a Form E which lists all the financial information relating to each party. The solicitors representing each party consider the Form E and will advise on what settlement there should be between the parties based on the section 25 criteria of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, which are listed below.
If the matter cannot be resolved through Voluntary Disclosure, Court proceedings will need to be issued. How the Court divides the assets of a relationship depends on whether the couple are married or not.
For married couples, the Court will make a financial order, which is known as ancillary relief. This covers the sale or transfer of property, maintenance payments made to a spouse, a lump sum payment and/or pension sharing and attachment orders. It also covers school fees and child maintenance "topping-up" orders, as well as child maintenance orders made by agreement between the parents.
The principles the Court considers when deciding the division of the assets of the marriage are enshrined within section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (otherwise known as the section 25 criteria):
In practical terms the concern of the Court is to ensure equality and fairness between the parties and if there are any children of the marriage, the Court will also consider keeping a “roof over the children’s head” as being a paramount importance. When deciding on the division of the assets of the marriage, the Court will start at a 50/50 split and then consider whether based on the section 25 criteria there should be a shift away from this.
One of the most common misconceptions in English law relating to family law is there is such a thing as a “common law marriage”. Quite simply it does not exist and with the rise in couples living together as opposed to seeking to marry, the Law Commission has suggested proposals placing the law in line with married couples relating to the division of assets on a divorce.
However until the law changes, the law as it relates to unmarried couples is that property such as a house which is held jointly shall be divided equally unless there is a clear contrary intention. If a property is held in the name of one party but the other party has contributed towards it in some way i.e. whether through direct financial contributions or through conduct, the Court will decide what share that party should receive.
With regards to other items of property such as clothing, if a former partner does not return them, all that can be done is to issue Court proceedings for the return of them.
If an unmarried partner dies and a will has not been drafted, not only do the intestacy laws make no provision for the surviving partner to inherit from the estate of their partner, but also the surviving partner does not benefit from the exemption from Inheritance Tax that would apply if the deceased’s estate passed to a spouse or civil partner. Indeed, in order to receive anything at all, the surviving partner may well have to go to Court to show that they co-owned assets which in some cases may have been paid for by both partners but were owned in one name only. The surviving partner may also have to show that they qualify for financial provision to be made out of the estate under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, which is designed to protect the dependants of people who die without leaving adequate financial provision for them. In any event, the surviving partner may face severe financial pressure whilst a claim is ongoing, even if it is ultimately successful.
When a couple separates, there are a number of issues relating to children, which can be resolved either through a formal agreement or through the issuing of Court proceedings:
There are a number of other orders which can only be obtained through the Court in relation to children:
The following people can apply for the above Orders:
The Court will only make an order if it is in the interests of the child and will consider the following Welfare Checklist criteria when deciding what order to make:
If the Court considers that the welfare of the child is at risk, it could order a CAFCASS report. A CAFCASS officer will prepare the report and give recommendations as to what is in the child’s best interests. From the time of issuing proceedings until the final hearing the matter could take between 6 to 8 months to be resolved.
If the location of a child is not known an application can be made to the Court seeking an Order compelling a person or organisations such the NHS or Inland Revenue to disclose the address.